P-005 Anesthetic considerations and the role of blood pressure management in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Increasingly used in North America, endovascular thrombolysis for ischemic stroke results in high recanalization rates without a comparable increase in good clinical outcomes. Many neurointerventionalists prefer general anesthesia to keep patients still. The purpose of this study is to identify the role of anesthesia and any other associated periprocedural factors in determining clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular procedures for acute ischemic stroke. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who underwent open label intra-arterial procedures for stroke from 2003 to 2009 in our intra-arterial database. Data were collected from chart reviews and automated anesthesia records. We used the Houston Intra-arterial Therapy (HIAT) score (1 point for age >75 years; 1 for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >18 and 1 point for glucose >150 mg/dl) for adjusting for baseline differences. The primary clinical outcome was modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 3 months. Results 96 patients (67 males, median age 65 years) with median NIHSS 17 (range 12–20) were included in the study. The distribution of type of anesthesia was as follows: 48/96 general anesthesia, 44/96 conscious sedation (14) or local anesthesia only (30), and 4/96 undetermined. 7/48 (15%) in the general anesthesia group had good clinical outcome compared with 29/44 (66%) in the local anesthesia/conscious sedation group (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.45). After adjusting for HIAT score and the presence or absence of any major anesthetic comorbidities, the general anesthesia group had significantly worse clinical outcome (p=0.001). Lower blood pressure correlated with poorer clinical outcomes in both anesthesia groups. The lowest mean systolic blood pressure in the general anesthesia group was 104 mm Hg compared with 135 mm Hg in the local anesthesia/conscious sedation group (p=0.0001). Conclusion The use of general anesthesia during endovascular procedures in acute ischemic strokes is associated with poorer clinical outcomes at 3 months. This could be because of lower periprocedural blood pressures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".