MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982951838 · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00182-3

Controlled dilatation of the uterine cervix – an experimental visceral pain model

2002· article· en· W1982951838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Priti Bajaj, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Hans Gregersen, Poul Petersen, Hans Madsen, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMcGill Pain QuestionnaireVisual analogue scaleBalloonNeurostimulationAnesthesiaVisceral painNociceptionCervixSurgeryStimulationInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain originating from the female reproductive organs is a substantial clinical problem to treat. Experimental models may be a tool for the study of visceral pain mechanisms and hence provide information to aid in formulating new treatment strategies. The aim was to develop and evaluate the performance and safety of a model for nociceptive stimulation of the uterine cervix by balloon dilatation using impedance planimetry. Three consecutive (repeated) dilatations at 1 ml/min, an isovolumetric and a fast dilatation at 2 ml/min were performed. Pilot studies were conducted in vitro on hysterectomy specimens, followed by application of the model in 14 healthy females. Subjects indicated the quality of perception and pain during dilatations by verbal reports and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the intensity by a continuous electronic visual analog scale. The pain location was marked on an anatomical map. The balloon cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured simultaneously. The experimental procedure was atraumatic. Pain was evoked in all subjects, with referral to the hypogastric and low back regions. The word descriptors on the MPQ and the areas of referred sensations were similar to that seen clinically in abortion, labor and menstrual pain. The pain intensity correlated with balloon CSA (r=0.9, P<0.001). No significant differences were found for the balloon volumes (4.2, 3.8 and 3.9 ml) or CSA (163, 122 and 123 mm(2)) to pain threshold (PT) for repeated dilatations, suggesting the reliability of the model. There was significant correlation between the balloon volume and CSA to reach the PT for single and repeated cervical dilatations. During isovolumetric distension, greater overall pain intensity was demonstrated for the prolonged as compared to the shorter duration cervical stimulation. In conclusion, this is the first human experimental pain model for dilatation of the uterine cervix, providing a safe, controlled, quantifiable stimulus that evoked reliable pain scores. The model thus provides a new possibility to study gynecological pain and may lead to better characterization and treatment of female visceral pain syndromes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207