Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore la genèse du paysage construit 'patrimonial' québécois, c'est-à-dire des monuments et des ensembles bâtis crédités de porter l'identité et la mémoire du Québec, plus précisément du Canada français. On y observe en effet, par quelques fenêtres ouvertes sur le XX e siècle, l'investissement d'une signification française dans quelques hauts lieux québécois engendrés à des fins aussi touristiques que patrimoniales, ce qui explique, comme on le découvrira simultanément, le caractère centripète de ce processus d'invention identitaire, enclenché dans les territoires de villégiature et décalqué depuis l'arrière-pays vers les villes. This article explores the genesis of the built heritage landscape in Quebec, namely monuments and built ensembles deemed to incarnate the identity and collective memory of Quebec – or more specifically French Canada. Using examples from the twentieth century, we look at how several famous Quebec sites, developed for both tourism and heritage purposes, were endowed with symbolic 'Frenchness', thus illustrating the centripetal nature of the identity creation process initiated in tourism areas in Quebec's hinterland and subsequently transferred to cities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".