MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983005945 · doi:10.1139/t02-038

The Eureka River landslide and dam, Peace River Lowlands, Alberta

2002· article· en· W1983005945 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brendan Miller, D. M. Crudën

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideGeologyChannel (broadcasting)Landslide classificationHydrology (agriculture)SedimentGeomorphologyQuaternaryBankRiver valleyArchaeologyGeotechnical engineeringPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eureka River landslide of June 1990, at 50 Mm3, is one of the largest historical landslides on the Interior Plains of Canada. It is one of seven large translational landslides to have occurred in the Peace River Lowlands within the last 65 years. Each landslide occurred in Quaternary sediments deposited within a preglacial valley. Each landslide formed a dam. The rupture surface of the Eureka River landslide in preglacial lacustrine sediment, 125 m below the Peace River Lowlands plains, extended beneath the river channel causing the channel to be elevated. The resulting landslide dam was over 20 m high, forming a lake exceeding 8 km in length. The river cut a new channel around the toe of the landslide, abandoning the prelandslide channel. As the new channel is free of armour, incision has been rapid. After 10 years, the dam now stands approximately 5 m high.Key words: landslide, landslide dam, Peace River, Alberta, preglacial valley, geomorphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207