Directions home: Approaches to African-Canadian literature by George Elliott Clarke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A noir 'peau rouge, '" as he defines himself in the introduction to the book Red, Clarke is Africadian 1 with roots in the Mi'kma'ki culture of Nova scotia.ten years after the publication of Odysseys Home: Mapping African-Canadian Literature, this new critical collection continues to defend the argument that african-Canadian (or Black Canadian) literature cannot be read adequately without considering "the historical (or 'indigenous') african-Canadian population and its cultural production as a constitutive element" (Directions Home 4).resultant from Clarke's long interest in black culture in Canada and extensive archival research in Nova scotia, Odysseys Home includes the discussion of writings by blacks dating back to 1785. in doing so, Clarke contradicts the premise that african-Canadian literature began with the publication of austin Clarke's first novel in 1964.reiterating his critical stand in the introduction to Directions Home, Clarke argues that african-Canadian literature encompasses "the new and the old, the comefrom-away and the down-home, the urban and the rural, the pull of the regional and the equally irresistible seductions of african-american and afro-Caribbean culture" (4).The selection of fifteen essays responds to this inclusive character, discussing african-Canadian literature from diverse origins and in different modes of expression.Variety here also serves to demystify traditional concepts of what is or is not literature.interested in african-Canadian literature for what it is and has been, Clarke observes that settler-descended african-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".