The role of seasonally altering photoperiod in regulating physiology in Atlantic cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>). Part II. Somatic growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research to date has not clearly defined the role of photoperiod in regulating somatic growth in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). The present study followed individual growth performance, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I, and relative liver size in response to a range of experimental photoperiod treatments where populations were transferred from an ambient photoperiod regime to continuous illumination at strategic times during the first 2 years of life. While this work demonstrated that application of continuous illumination could directly stimulate somatic growth, this growth stimulation is transitory with no accumulative effect of prolonged exposure to continuous illumination. Importantly, it was apparent that the photic inhibition of maturation realized a far more significant growth stimulation, and in populations where this occurred, sexually dimorphic growth patterns became apparent. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I displays a seasonal rhythm correlated with ambient temperature under natural photic conditions and in certain circumstances could be used as an accurate predictor of growth rate. Overall, this work further refines the guidelines on photoperiod management during commercial ongrowing of the species to help realize the maximum economic potential of cod aquaculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".