MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gut and Adipocyte Peptides

2006· article· en· W1983068468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zachary T. Bloomgarden

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineIncretinMedicineType 2 diabetesGastric emptyingInsulinGlucagon-like peptide-1Glucose homeostasisLiraglutideDipeptidyl peptidase-4Diabetes mellitusSomatostatinInsulin resistanceStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the third in a series of articles on presentations at the American Diabetes Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, 10–14 June 2005. Daniel Drucker (Toronto, Canada) reviewed evidence that the incretin effect, the phenomenon of enteral glucose loading increasing the insulin secretory response to an increase in blood glucose, is reduced in type 2 diabetes, and that the incretin glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 may ameliorate this defect. The major limitation to use of GLP-1 in clinical treatment is its rapid clearance by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV. GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon secretion, and delays gastric emptying. Loss-of-function studies with a mouse model not expressing the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R−/−), and with the GLP-1R antagonist exendin-(9-39), show effects of GLP-1 on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the reproductive system, the portal glucose receptor, gastric motility, and a number of other potential targets. GLP-1R−/− mice have normal insulin sensitivity, arguing against an effect of the system on insulin action, but have glucose intolerance, and administration of exendin-(9-39) similarly is associated with glucose intolerance in mice, in primates, and in humans. Drucker noted that there is controversy as to whether the product of DPP-IV degradation may act at a second GLP-1R, perhaps having additional effects on metabolism, but that GLP-1 does not lower glucose levels in GLP-1R−/− mice, arguing against such a receptor. In the model, pancreatic insulin mRNA levels are reduced and somatostatin mRNA levels are increased. The perfused pancreas isolated from GLP-1R−/− animals shows normal insulin response to glucose, although without response to GLP-1. GLP-1R−/− β-cells appear to have increased sensitivity to the incretin glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), perhaps representing an adaptive upregulation of GIP and/or of GIP response, and mice neither expressing the GLP-1 nor the GIP receptor show glucose intolerance with decreased insulin …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207