MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983077444 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118304

First results of<i>Herschel</i>-SPIRE observations of Titan

2011· article· en· W1983077444 on OpenAlexaff
R. Courtin, B. M. Swinyard, R. Moreno, T. Fulton, E. Lellouch, M. Rengel, P. Hartogh

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpire (mollusc)Titan (rocket family)PhysicsAstrobiologyAstronomyBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the composition of Titan’s stratosphere from high-resolution submillimetric observations performed with the SPIRE instrument on the Herschel satellite. From the flux density spectrum measured in the 20 − 52 cm-1 interval at an apodized resolution of 0.08 cm-1, we determine the stratospheric abundances of CH4, CO, HCN, as well as the isotopic ratios 12C/13C = 87 ± 6 in CO and 96 ± 13 in HCN, 14N/15N = 76 ± 6, and 16O/18O = 380 ± 60. The last of these results is the first documented measurement of Titan’s 16O/18O ratio in CO, with a value 24% lower than the terrestrial ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207