MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983111231 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnn016

Lower Bound on the Blow-up Rate of the Axisymmetric Navier–Stokes Equations

2008· article· en· W1983111231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPointwiseRotational symmetryUpper and lower boundsScale invarianceCompressibilityMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider axisymmetric strong solutions of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in with nontrivial swirl. Such solutions are not known to be globally defined, but it is shown in ([1], Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 35 (1982), 771–831) that they could only blow up on the axis of symmetry. Let z denote the axis of symmetry and r measure the distance to the z-axis. Suppose the solution satisfies the pointwise scale invariant bound |v(x, t)| ⩽ C*(r2 − t)−1/2 for −T0 ⩽ t < 0 and 0 < C* < ∞ allowed to be large, we then prove that v is regular at time zero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.356
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it