MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983119619 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.1176

Expression and regulation of mouse <i>Mtsh1</i> during limb and branchial arch development

2001· article· en· W1983119619 on OpenAlexaff
Qiaoming Long, Byung Keon Park, Marc Ekker

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBranchial archBiologyForelimbAnatomyMesenchymal stem cellCell biologyIn situ hybridizationHomeotic geneLimb developmentEmbryogenesisGeneGene expressionEmbryoGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mouse genome contains at least two genes, Mtsh1 and Mtsh2, related in sequence to the Drosophila homeotic gene teashirt (tsh). In this paper, we report the characterization of Mtsh1 expression in the developing branchial arches and forelimbs during mouse embryogenesis. Mtsh1 was found predominantly transcribed in the mesenchymal tissue of branchial arches and forelimbs. Surgical removal of the epithelium of both forelimb and branchial arch significantly decreased the expression of Mtsh1 in the mesenchymal cells of these tissues. Upon implantation of FGF8-soaked beads into arches and limbs, Mtsh1 transcription was up-regulated. In contrast, when BMP4-soaked beads were implanted, Mtsh1 expression was inhibited. Together, these results suggest that mouse Mtsh1 gene may be involved in the outgrowth of limbs and arches and may be functioning downstream of BMP and FGF signaling pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207