MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983128251 · doi:10.1097/iop.0b013e318185307d

Anetodermic Variant of a Periorbital Pilomatricoma

2008· article· en· W1983128251 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno F. Fernandes, Ahmed Al-Hinai, Rubens Belfort, Enzo Castiglione, Bryan Arthurs, Miguel N. Burnier

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePilomatricomaDermatologyPilomatrixoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Pilomatricoma usually presents as a solitary hard nodule located deep in the dermis. However, a variant termed anetodermic is often seen in the elderly. Instead of a hard nodule, a rapidly growing bullous lesion is seen. The authors report a 60-year-old man who presented with an erythematous bullous lesion at the left medial canthus. The lesion started as a small 3-mm papule and grew significantly to a 12-mm lesion in 5 weeks. Histopathologically, the tumor was composed of basophilic and keratinized shadow cells typical of pilomatricoma. Anetodermic changes could also be seen, represented by intralesional hemorrhage, dilated blood and lymphatic vessels, and disruption of dermal collagen fibers. The anetodermic variant of pilomatricoma was described in 1943 and accounts for only 2% of cases. Compression of vessels by the neoplastic process and peritumoral inflammatory infiltration are the proposed pathogenic mechanisms underlying the atypical findings. A 60-year-old man presented with an erythematous bullous lesion at the left medial canthus; histopathologic evaluation of the biopsy specimen disclosed the anetodermic variant of pilomatricoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207