MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983132297 · doi:10.2118/162837-ms

Quantification of cm-Scale Heterogeneities in Tight-Oil Intervals of the Cardium Formation at Pembina, WCSB, Alberta, Canada.

2012· article· en· W1983132297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOil shalePermeability (electromagnetism)MineralogyPermeameterTight oilSoil scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A detailed, fine-scale, reservoir characterization study of (light) tight oil rock intervals in the Cardium Formation is performed using an innovative combination of X-Ray CT Scan technology, hardness and profile (probe) permeability measurements. This study aims to quantify the geometry, degree of heterogeneity, and several other key properties, of individual microlithofacies within the highly bioturbated sandstone lithofacies. Contrasting bulk density values between these microlithofacies domains is identified using X-ray CT-Scan imagery reconstruction. Statistical analysis yields numerical information regarding geometry and connectivity of individual bodies for a given microlithofacies within the analyzed volume. Permeability, as estimated from a profile (probe) permeameter, and hardness of the samples, as quantified using a hardness index (from Leeb Hardness measurements), is investigated for a sub-centimeter 2D grid on slabbed surfaces. This detailed mapping allows the analysis of mm- to cm-scale correlations between rock quality and CT images. Identified microlithofacies include SS1 and SS2 (sandstones), SH1 (shale), and PB (pyrite-filled burrows). Permeability can exceed 50 mD in SS1 microlithofacies, but generally is less than 1 mD for SS2 and 0.01 mD for SH1. Volumetric reconstruction of these microlithofacies yields approximately 85% total sandstone content for an average sample from tight-oil Cardium lithofacies (which is higher than visual assessment of 50-60% sandstone). The sandstone ratio of SS2/SS1 is between 3 and 5; microlithofacies SH1 and PB have a patchy distribution through the core. SS1 appears as highly disturbed relics of very thinly bedded patches, and sandstone-filled, subhorizontally oriented, sub-centimeter scale burrows. Relatively higher values of bulk density and hardness index characterize SS2 and SH1 microlithofacies. The overall low permeability usually measured in this lithofacies can be attributed to the complex interplay between biological and physical sedimentary structures at the cm-scale, generating more or less randomly connected volumes with contrasting flow and storage capacity. This study provides a roadmap for more accurate property measurements and modeling at the core scale for this complex lithofacies of the Cardium Formation; we believe that this will also be useful for other tight oil reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it