MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983138862 · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/055605

Fault detection of planetary gearboxes using new diagnostic parameters

2012· article· en· W1983138862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVibrationFault (geology)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceBearing (navigation)AmplitudeRoot mean squareAcousticsStructural engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringGeologyPhysicsArtificial intelligenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planetary gearboxes are commonly used in modern industry because of their large transmission ratio and strong load-bearing capacity. They generally work under heavy load and tough working environment and therefore their key components including sun gear, planet gears, ring gear, etc are subject to severe pitting and fatigue crack. Planetary gearboxes significantly differ from fixed-axis gearboxes and exhibit unique behavior, which invalidates the use of the diagnostic parameters developed and suitable for fixed-axis gearboxes. Therefore, there is a need to develop parameters specifically for detecting and diagnosing faults of planetary gearboxes. In this study, two diagnostic parameters are proposed based on the examination of the vibration characteristics of planetary gearboxes in both time and frequency domains. One is the root mean square of the filtered signal (FRMS) and the other is the normalized summation of positive amplitudes of the difference spectrum between the unknown signal and the healthy signal (NSDS). To test the proposed diagnostic parameters, we conducted experiments on a planetary gearbox test rig with sun gear faults including a cracked tooth and a pitted tooth. The vibration signals were measured under different motor speeds. The proposed parameters are compared with the existing parameters reported in the literature. The comparison results show the proposed diagnostic parameters perform better than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it