Towards Scalable and Accurate Online Feature Selection for Big Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feature selection is important in many big data applications. There are at least two critical challenges. Firstly, in many applications, the dimensionality is extremely high, in millions, and keeps growing. Secondly, feature selection has to be highly scalable, preferably in an online manner such that each feature can be processed in a sequential scan. In this paper, we develop SAOLA, a Scalable and Accurate On Line Approach for feature selection. With a theoretical analysis on a low bound on the pair wise correlations between features in the currently selected feature subset, SAOLA employs novel online pair wise comparison techniques to address the two challenges and maintain a parsimonious model over time in an online manner. An empirical study using a series of benchmark real data sets shows that SAOLA is scalable on data sets of extremely high dimensionality, and has superior performance over the state-of-the-art feature selection methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it