MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983174351 · doi:10.1002/macp.200300098

Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Using Multidentate Amine Ligands Supported on Soluble Hyperbranched Polyglycidol

2004· article· en· W1983174351 on OpenAlexaff
Kainthan Rajesh Kumar, Jayachandran N. Kizhakkedathu, Donald E. Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Chemistry and Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymer chemistryPolymerizationAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationChemistryDispersityLiving free-radical polymerizationIonic polymerizationStyreneChain transferReversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizationRadical polymerizationPrecipitation polymerizationLiving polymerizationChain-growth polymerizationPolymerCopolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Summary: Controlled polymerization of styrene in toluene was achieved by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using hyperbranched polyglycidol‐supported multidentate amine ligands/Cu I Br catalyst systems. These catalyst systems with nanoscopic dimensions were more active than the corresponding low‐molecular‐weight ligands. The controlled/living nature of the polymerization is supported by linear first order plots (ln[M] o /[M] versus time) and a linear increase of $\overline M _{\rm n}$ versus conversion as well as low polydispersity. Similar controlled polymerization of methyl methacrylate was possible in acetonitrile. Up to 97% of total copper used for polymerization could be removed from the polymer by simple precipitation in methanol and filtration. Molecular weight characteristics for styrene polymerization using PG‐triamine as a ligand. magnified image Molecular weight characteristics for styrene polymerization using PG‐triamine as a ligand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Chemistry and PhysicsSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207