Study on Measuring Particle Size Distribution of a Nanodiamond Powder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle size distribution (PSD) of a nanodiamond powder in a high concentration suspension was measured by a new dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique based on the Doppler frequency shifting effect. Influence of dispersing pre-treatment, distribution bases and materials’ properties on DLS results was analyzed, and PSD results were validated by TEM analysis. It was found that the optimized ultrasonic dispersing time of the diamond powder in a sodium hexametaphosphate (SHP) solution was about 5 minutes. And median sizes of the nanodiamond powder were 115.6 nm, 53.0 nm and 32.6 nm, based on light intensity, volume and number respectively. PSD results of the nanodiamond based on number accorded well with results from TEM analysis. And PSD results were affected hardly by refractive indices of the diamond and the dispersing medium, while they were affected markedly by viscosity of the medium. It is concluded that this new DLS technique could measure PSD of the nanodiamond powder in high concentration suspensions which has been dispersed properly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".