MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983194883 · doi:10.1080/17415993.2010.493199

Understanding the effects of sulfur on mercury capture from coal-fired utility flue gases

2010· article· en· W1983194883 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric A. Morris, Kazuki Morita, Charles Q. Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sulfur Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Tokyo
KeywordsFlue gasChemistryOxidizing agentMercury (programming language)Sulfur trioxideCoalChlorineSulfurEnvironmental chemistryCoal combustion productsSulfur dioxideInorganic chemistryCombustionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coal combustion continues to be a major source of energy throughout the world and is the leading contributor to anthropogenic mercury emissions. Effective control of these emissions requires a good understanding of how other flue gas constituents such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and sulfur trioxide (SO3) may interfere in the removal process. Most of the current literature suggests that SO2 hinders elemental mercury (Hg0) oxidation by scavenging oxidizing species such as chlorine (Cl2) and reduces the overall efficiency of mercury capture, while there is evidence to suggest that SO2 with oxygen (O2) enhances Hg0 oxidation by promoting Cl2 formation below 100 °C. However, studies in which SO2 was shown to have a positive correlation with Hg0 oxidation in full-scale utilities indicate that these interactions may be heavily dependent on operating conditions, particularly chlorine content of the coal and temperature. While bench-scale studies explicitly targeting SO3 are scarce, the general consensus among full-scale coal-fired utilities is that its presence in flue gas has a strong negative correlation with mercury capture efficiency. The exact reason behind this observed correlation is not completely clear, however. While SO3 is an inevitable product of SO2 oxidation by O2, a reaction that hinders Hg0 oxidation, it readily reacts with water vapor, forms sulfuric acid (H2SO4) at the surface of carbon, and physically blocks active sites of carbon. On the other hand, H2SO4 on carbon surfaces may increase mercury capacity either through the creation of oxidation sites on the carbon surface or through a direct reaction of mercury with the acid. However, neither of these beneficial impacts is expected to be of practical significance for an activated carbon injection system in a real coal-fired utility flue gas. Keywords: sulfur dioxidesulfur trioxidemercury capturecoal-fired power plantactivated carbon Acknowledgements The authors would like to express sincere gratitude toward the Consortium of Sustainable Materials, a working partnership between the University of Tokyo and the University of Toronto, for financial support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sulfur ChemistrySame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207