Dual kinin B1 and B2 receptor activation provides enhanced blood–brain barrier permeability and anticancer drug delivery into brain tumors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The low permeability of the BBB is largely responsible for the lack of effective systemic chemotherapy against primary and metastatic brain tumors. Kinin B1R and B2R have been shown to mediate reversible tumor-selective BBB disruption in preclinical animal models. We investigated whether co-administration of two novel potent kinin B1R and B2R agonists offers an advantage over administering each agonist alone for enhancing BBB permeability and tumor targeting of drugs in the malignant F98 glioma rat model. A new covalent kinin heterodimer that equally stimulates B1R and B2R was also constructed for the purpose of our study. We found that co-administration of B1R and B2R agonists, or alternatively administration of the kinin heterodimer more effectively delivered the MRI contrast agent Gd-DTPA and the anticancer drug carboplatin to brain tumors and surrounding tissues than the agonists alone (determined by MRI and ICP-MS methods). Importantly, the efficient delivery of carboplatin by the dual kinin receptor targeting on the BBB translated into increased survival of glioma-bearing rats. Thus, this report describes a potential strategy for maximizing the brain bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it