MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983285232 · doi:10.1021/ic020294k

A Density Functional Study of S<sub>N</sub>2 Substitution at Square-Planar Platinum(II) Complexes

2002· article· en· W1983285232 on OpenAlexaff
J.R. Cooper, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPlatinumSubstitution (logic)PlanarSquare (algebra)CrystallographyStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energetics and reaction path in a series of S(N)2 substitution reactions at square-planar Pt(II) complexes have been studied by the application of density functional theory (DFT). Calculated free energies show excellent correlation with their experimental counterparts, while the enthalpic and entropic contributions individually indicate the presence of weak intermolecular interactions not accounted for in the present model. The nature of the leaving ligand has been shown to be much more significant in determining the activation barrier than that of the entering ligand; it is inferred (and confirmed by analysis of individual bond energies) that the reaction is driven by the dissociation of the leaving ligand, with the entering ligand playing a more passive role. Analysis of the intrinsic reaction coordinate indicates, further, that the trans ligand plays an unexpectedly dynamic role in stabilizing the transition state due to competition between stabilization and the steric effects of the entering and leaving ligands. The cis ligands, by contrast, are shown to move only slightly through the course of the reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations268
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207