MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983306862 · doi:10.1109/ivnc.2013.6624762

Extraction of multiple parameters of a light-activated thermionic cathode with a single type of experiment

2013· article· en· W1983306862 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir H. Khoshaman, Mau-Chung Frank Chang, Alireza Nojeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBCFRST Foundation
KeywordsThermionic emissionSpace chargeCathodeMode (computer interface)Poisson's equationComputational physicsSaturation (graph theory)VoltagePhysicsPoisson distributionMechanicsAtomic physicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringElectronMathematicsComputer scienceEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method is proposed to evaluate the internal parameters of a light induced thermionic emission (LITE) device based on a single type of current-voltage (I-V) sweep experiment. An algorithm is developed to calculate the entire (I-V) characteristic of the device in the three operating regimes: the retarding mode, the space-charge limited mode and the saturation mode. In order to obtain the I-V characteristics in the space-charge limited mode, Vlaslov's and Poisson's equations are solved analytically. The experimental results are fitted to the simulation results in order to calculate the internal parameters of the thermionic device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal Radiation and Cooling TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207