MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983315941 · doi:10.1039/b922298g

PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of CH2F2, ionisation potential and ionic fragmentation appearance potentials

2010· article· en· W1983315941 on OpenAlexafffund
Piotr W. Forysinski, Philipp Zielke, David Luckhaus, Ruth Signorell

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsDifluoromethaneAdiabatic processIonizationFragmentation (computing)Atomic physicsIonization energyIonic bondingChemistryBasis setDissociation (chemistry)IonPotential energyKinetic energyComputational chemistryPhysicsDensity functional theoryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first vibrationally resolved pulsed-field-ionisation zero-kinetic-energy (PFI-ZEKE) photoelectron spectrum of difluoromethane from its adiabatic ionisation potential (formation of the C(2v) conformer of CH(2)F(2)(+)) to the onset of the first ionic fragmentation channel is presented. Precise values for the adiabatic ionisation potential (12.7252 +/- 0.0009 eV) and the appearance potentials of the H loss product (13.065 +/- 0.003 eV) and the F loss product (14.30 +/- 0.06 eV) of the cation are reported. Ab initio harmonic calculations were performed at the MP2 level with quadruple-zeta basis sets in an attempt to assign the newly observed vibrational structure which, in its previously published low resolution form, led to numerous speculations regarding its true origin. The adiabatic ionisation potential and the fragmentation appearance potentials for the three lowest dissociation channels are also predicted in the complete basis set limit of CCSD(T) theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207