A novel compilation approach for image processing graphs on a many-core platform with explicitly managed memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Explicitly managed memory many-cores (EMM) have been a part of the industrial landscape for the last decade. The IBM CELL processor, general-purpose graphics processing units (GP-GPU) and the STHORM embedded many-core of STMicroelectronics are representative examples. This class of architecture is expected to scale well and to deliver good performance per watt and per mm2 of silicon. As such, it is appealing for application problems with regular data access patterns. However, this moves significant complexity to the programmer who must master parallelization and data movement. High level programming tools are therefore essential in order to allow the effective programming of EMM many-cores to a wide class of programmers. This paper presents a novel approach designed for simplifying the programming of EMM many-core architectures. It initially addresses the image processing application domain and has been targeted to the STHORM platform. It takes a high-level description of the computation kernel algorithm and generates an OpenCL kernel optimized for the target architecture, while managing the parallelization and data movements across the hierarchy in a transparent fashion. The goal is to provide both high productivity and high performance without requiring parallel computing expertise from the programmer, nor the need for application code specialization for the target architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".