MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983333902 · doi:10.1063/1.1518688

Monte Carlo calculation of second and third virial coefficients of linear and star polymers on lattice

2002· article· en· W1983333902 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuhito Shida, Kaoru Ohno, Yoshiyuki Kawazoe, Yo Nakamura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirial coefficientStar polymerMonte Carlo methodLattice (music)Statistical physicsThermodynamicsPolymerMonte Carlo algorithmLinear polymerVirial theoremMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsStatisticsCopolymerNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient algorithm for counting contributing terms in the calculation of second and third virial coefficients of the lattice polymer model was proposed. The algorithm was applied to linear and three-arm star polymers. The algorithm’s efficiency was demonstrated, and the obtained results were compared to both experimental and computational results already reported. To the authors’ best knowledge, the estimation of the third virial coefficient of the three-arm star polymer is the first reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207