MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983345263 · doi:10.3141/1863-07

Canadian National Railway Experience with 136-lb Thick Web Rail Switch Points

2004· article· en· W1983345263 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nigel William Peters

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Pacific Railway (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Point (geometry)EngineeringStructural engineeringAdvertisingBusinessGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1999, Canadian National Railway was the first Class 1 railroad to move away from switch points with reinforcing straps and introduce the use of thick web rail into all its 136-lb turnouts. A review of the history of reinforcing straps on switch points in North America indicates that this is an obsolete practice carried on unnecessarily. The moment of inertia of a 136-lb thick web rail is nearly 2.5 greater than that of the European Zu1-60 asymmetrical thick web section, which has performed so well in tangential geometry turnouts in North America. The advantages of adopting the 136-lb thick web rail section as a standard for use in switch points is one of economy, primarily related to the labor savings in the fabrication of the switch point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207