MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983372251 · doi:10.3138/utq.77.3.940

Liberty before and after Liberalism: Milton's Shifting Politics and the Current Crisis in Liberal Theory

2008· article· en· W1983372251 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feisal G. Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolityLiberalismClassical liberalismPluralism (philosophy)PoliticsLawPower (physics)SociologyConstitutionFaithIndividualismTolerationPolitical scienceLaw and economicsEnvironmental ethicsPolitical economyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current crisis in American liberal theory marks a shift away from the critique of individualism to an exploration of the urgent challenges posed by cultural pluralism. Appeals by various ‘fundamentalist’ constituencies to the overriding authority of essential truths generated outside the consensus of the polity have the power to destroy toleration and the liberal nature of the polity. A study of Milton proves invaluable in helping to evaluate the viability of one prominent solution, for texts like A Treatise of Civil Power seem to sketch out what Paul Kahn calls a ‘liberalism of faith,’ that is, the constitution of secure domains within the polity for the contemplation and practice of truths alien to the consensus. The example of Milton suggests, however, just how fallible a solution, and how ultimately illiberal, such an extension of liberalism might be.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.060
Scholarly communication0.0130.013
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207