MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983395198 · doi:10.3138/md.2012-s79

Victorian Railway Accident and the Melodramatic Imagination

2012· article· en· W1983395198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matthew Wilson Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaPeriod (music)Accident (philosophy)Representation (politics)LiteratureHistoryCapital (architecture)ArtAestheticsVisual artsPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: A central crisis of representation in the Victorian period was this: how might one represent an ill that is not villainous but systemic? This article traces the ways in which several Victorians struggled to address that quandary during a brief period of paradigm shift: the middle years of the 1860s. The article’s first half explores ways in which the railway accident interrupted central conventions of melodrama. This section surveys editorial cartoonists, writers for Dickens’s journals Household Words and All the Year Round, volume one of Karl Marx’s Capital (1867), and Augustin Daly’s sensation drama Under the Gaslight (1867). The second half focuses on Dickens’s ghost story “No. 1 Branch Line. The Signal-Man.” Written a year after the Staplehurst disaster, the story gropes toward a new language for a traumatic condition, a language haunted by melodrama even as it moves beyond it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.034
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207