MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983413493 · doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181b7c521

Hyperinsulinemia in nonobese women reporting a moderate weight gain at the beginning of menopause

2010· article· en· W1983413493 on OpenAlexaff
André Lemay, Lucile Turcot, Francine Déchêne, Sylvie Dodin, Jean‐Claude Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Saint-François d'Assise
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperinsulinemiaInternal medicineBody mass indexInsulin resistanceEndocrinologyMenopauseWeight gainTriglycerideWaistInsulinObesityCholesterolBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: At menopause, the frequent weight gain excess could be related to insulin resistance. This study evaluated the prevalence of hyperinsulinemia in nonobese women reporting a moderate increase in weight at the beginning of menopause. METHODS: Women who were postmenopausal for 1 to 5 years and reporting a weight gain of 5 to 15 kg were evaluated for weight, eating habits, physical activity, body circumferences, fasting blood glucose level, insulin level, and lipid profile. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed in subgroups of 21 hyperinsulinemic women and 21 normoinsulinemic women matched for age, weight, height, body mass index, and hysterectomy. RESULTS: Among 279 postmenopausal women reporting a weight gain of 8.7 +/- 4.4 kg, insulin level was increased in 49 (17.6%) women as compared with normoinsulinemic women (108.53 +/- 31.35 vs 58.96 +/- 14.52 pmol/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences were also found for glucose (5.24 +/- 0.37 vs 5.05 +/- 0.42 mmol/L, respectively; P = 0.003), insulin resistance as estimated by homeostasis model assessment HOMA-2-IR (2.01 +/- 0.53 vs 1.10 +/- 0.27, respectively; P < 0.001), weight (72.6 +/- 8.0 vs 69.9 +/- 7.1 kg, respectively; P = 0.023), body mass index (28.3 +/- 2.3 vs 27.2 +/- 2.3 kg/m2, respectively; P = 0.003), and waist circumference (89.8 +/- 5.8 vs 86.0 +/- 6.5 cm, respectively; P < 0.001). Triglyceride levels were higher (1.47 +/- 0.66 vs 1.17 +/- 0.61 mmol/L, respectively; P = 0.002) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was lower (1.54 +/- 0.35 vs 1.72 +/- 0.42 mmol/L, respectively; P = 0.007) in the hyperinsulinemic and normoinsulinemic groups. Although insulin levels were higher in 21 hyperinsulinemic women at all times that oral glucose tolerance tests were performed, levels of glucose were also above those of 21 matched normoinsulinemic women at 1 and 2 hours and remained greater than 6.0 mmol/L at 2 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Because insulin resistance is frequently associated with weight gain in nonobese women at menopause, the measurement of fasting insulin, along with glucose, lipids, and waist circumference, may help to identify those who are at higher risk of developing glucose intolerance, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases and to implement early preventive measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207