An Intronic Polymorphism of the <i>hMLH1</i> Gene Contributes Toward Incomplete Genetic Testing for HNPCC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a common hereditary cancer. Genetic testing is complicated by the multiple DNA mismatch repair genes that underlie the disorder. Many suspected HNPCC families have no germ-line mutation identified. We reassessed an unusual family that appeared to have 2 individuals homozygous for a germline mutation within exon 1 of the hMLH1 gene. A few rare individuals with two inherited mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes have been reported and appear to have a distinct clinical appearance. However, there were no clinical features in the family discussed here that were consistent with constitutive lack of hMLH1. Redesigning the intronic primers for exon 1 identified a common polymorphism located within the original intronic primer site. The polymorphism prevented amplification of the wild-type allele, giving the erroneous appearance of homozygous inheritance of the mutated allele. Likewise, common intronic polymorphisms, if located within primer sequences on the chromosome harboring the HNPCC germ-line mutation could restrict amplification to only the wild-type allele, which may contribute significantly to the low success rate of identifying mutations in HNPCC families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it