Natural durability of black locust (<i>Robinia pseudoacacia</i>L.) wood grown in Wallonia, Belgium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decay resistance of black locust ( Robinia pseudoacacia L.) heartwood was evaluated on standardized test specimens taken from mature and juvenile wood in 25 trees distributed over five sites in Wallonia, Belgium. The percentage mass losses caused by the wood-destroying fungi Coriolus versicolor CTB 863 A and Coniophora puteana BAM Ebw.15 were evaluated according to Cen/ts 15083-1 (Cen/ts 15083-1. 2005. Durability of wood and wood-based products — determination of the natural durability of solid wood against wood-destroying fungi, test methods — Part 1: Basidiomycetes. European Comm. for Standardization, Brussels). Black locust is classified as a “very durable” wood (class 1), while the juvenile heartwood (located near the pith) is classified in classes 1 to 2. The statistical analysis does not reveal any significant differences among the sites, suggesting that the growth environment of the trees has no effect on their natural durability. However, statistical analysis shows very highly significant differences among trees and between the two radial positions in the tree, with mature wood being more resistant than juvenile wood. Using such a naturally very durable species could reduce reliance on preservative treatment and the use of tropical species generally recommended for outdoor woodwork.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".