CENTRIFUGAL YIELD AND FURTHER MICROSCOPIC CHARACTERIZATION OF SEA BUCKTHORN JUICE PRODUCTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Yields of press juice for Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. sinensis and ssp. mongolica cv. Indian Summer were 69.2% and 62.8%, respectively. Centrifugation of the press juices at 4C, 4480 × g for 15 min provided yields of cream, serum and pellet of 1.72, 95.6 and 0.68% for ssp. sinensis, and 5.4, 92.3 and 0.32% for ssp. mongolica cv. Indian Summer. All percentages are percentage (w/w). The particulate of each juice was characterized microscopically and the particulate of cv. Indian Summer was much larger than that of ssp. sinensis. Much more oil was apparent microscopically in the cv. Indian Summer cream as expected from the yield data mentioned above. Pellet material was not distinguishable between the two ssp. Trichomes were visualized in greater detail, a particular particle that may be exclusive to cv. Indian Summer was described and the presence of crystalline material in aggregated particles was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".