Human genetic variations in the 5HT2A receptor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to determine if the agonist serotonin and antagonists loxapine and clozapine have an altered potency for four allelic variants (T25N, I197V, A447V, and H452Y) of the human 5HT2A receptor when compared to the wild-type allele. METHODS: The receptor or its variants are studied in an in-vitro functional assay system consisting of a Sf9 insect cell line that is stably transformed with the human wild-type and mutant alleles. This assay system measures release of calcium stores due to receptor activation by agonists and inhibition of this agonist stimulated response by antagonists. RESULTS: Both loxapine and clozapine exhibit non-competitive antagonism of serotonin stimulation of the human 5HT2A receptor signal transduction system and loxapine is the more potent inhibitor. This study shows that the I197V allele requires a two-fold higher concentration of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine to inhibit serotonin stimulation compared to the wild-type receptor (P = 0.036). The I197V mutation does not affect the inhibition of serotonin stimulation by the typical neuroleptic loxapine nor does it alter the activation of the receptor by serotonin. It is also significant that the results of this study indicate that the T25N, A447V, and H452Y mutations in the human 5HT2A receptor do not significantly alter the response of the receptor to the agonist serotonin or the antagonists loxapine and clozapine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it