MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983572889 · doi:10.1063/1.4803118

On the origin and convergence of a post-quantization constrained propagator for path integral simulations of rigid bodies

2013· article· en· W1983572889 on OpenAlexaff
Grégoire Guillon, Tao Zeng, Pierre–Nicholas Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropagatorPath integral formulationEstimatorQuantization (signal processing)Convergence (economics)Path integral Monte CarloApplied mathematicsMathematicsAngular momentumStatistical physicsRigid rotorMonte Carlo methodPhysicsClassical mechanicsRotor (electric)Quantum mechanicsAlgorithmQuantumMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new methodological procedure, based on Post-Quantization Constraints (PQC), to obtain approximate density matrices and energy estimators for use in path integral molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. The approach serves as a justification of the use of "RATTLE & SHAKE" type methods for path integrals. A thorough discussion of the underlying geometrical concepts is given. Two standard model systems, the particle on a ring and the three-dimensional linear rotor, are used to illustrate and benchmark the approach. In these two cases, matrix elements of the newly defined propagator are explicitly computed in both "angular coordinate" and "angular momentum" bases. A detailed analysis of the convergence properties of the density matrix, and energy estimator with respect to their "exact" counterparts, is presented along with numerical illustrations. We conclude that the use of a PQC-type propagator is justified and practical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207