MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983579736 · doi:10.1680/jees.14.00003

Design of a homogeneous radiation field in an LED photo-reactor

2014· article· en· W1983579736 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Linlong Yu, Gopal Achari, Cooper H. Langford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneousHomogeneity (statistics)RadiationDiodeIrradiationOptoelectronicsLight-emitting diodeMaterials scienceLight fieldOpticsPhotocatalysisPhysicsComputer scienceChemistryNuclear physicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a radiation field model for a light-emitting diode-based photocatalytic reactor has been developed. The model was tested using experimental data, and good agreement between the model and experimental results was noted. The model was used to investigate the impact of irradiated distance on the homogeneity of radiation field because it is shown that a homogeneous radiation field is the most efficient. The model can be used to design an efficient photoreactor by selecting the optimal gap between adjacent light-emitting diodes, the irradiated distance and the light output of light-emitting diodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207