MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983634562 · doi:10.1063/1.3644927

Surface structure, morphology, and growth mechanism of Fe3O4/ZnO thin films

2011· article· en· W1983634562 on OpenAlexaff
M. Paul, Dominik Kufer, Achim Müller, A. Ruff, M. Kamp, N. J. C. Ingle, M. Sing, R. Claessen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsCoalescence (physics)Island growthMaterials scienceElectron diffractionDiffractionMicrostructureWetting layerWettingThin filmCrystallographyMagnetiteRelaxation (psychology)Chemical physicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)EpitaxyOpticsChemistryComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have investigated the growth mechanism and surface structure of magnetite (Fe3O4) films grown on semiconducting ZnO substrates. Growth proceeds in a wetting layer plus island-mode and a later coalescence of islands, as was verified by electron diffraction, topography measurements of the surface, and the investigation of the microstructure. The typical (111) surface diffraction pattern magnetite is observed already at the early island growth stage. Due to the island-like growth mode, domain boundaries form upon coalescence of the islands. Twin boundaries have been evidenced between neighboring domains. Island growth enables partial relaxation of the misfit strain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of FerritesFrench-language works237,207