Operative Treatment of Periprosthetic Unstable Femoral Fractures of Vancouver Type B1 and C with Variable Plates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome after operative treatment with plate fixation in Vancouver B1 and C periprosthetic unstable femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective assessment of 15 patients who had under gone treatment for a periprosthetic unstable femoral fracture around primary hip arthroplasty between April 1997 and July 2010. The mean age of patients was 69 years(53 to 82 years) at the time of surgery and the mean duration of follow-up was 29.2 months (six to 110 months). According to Vancouver classification, 10 patients were type B1 and five were type C. According to the time of operation, open reduction and internal fixation was performed using four different plates. Bone graft was applied in all patients, regardless of the type of plate. The present review describes the clinical and radiographic results. Results: All patients were able to ambulate without assistance of crutches or walkers. Of the 15 patients, the fracture site was united in all patients. Postoperative dislocation of the ipsilateral hip was observed in one patient; however, there was no occurrence of further complications, such as infections, nerve injuries, or loosening of the femoral stems. Conclusion: In Vancouver type B1 and C fractures, without any loosening of the femoral stems, open reduction with plate fixation using our operative methods provided a satisfactory result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".