MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983666794 · doi:10.7202/045835ar

Les espaces de la solidarité familiale

2011· article· fr· W1983666794 on OpenAlex
Marianne Kempeneers, Isabelle Van Pevenage

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesESPACESociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les transformations de la famille contemporaine suscitent un ensemble de questions concernant notamment la définition de ce qu’est une « famille » aujourd’hui. Les critères statistiques officiels, le critère résidentiel entre autres, rendent difficilement compte de la réalité des liens qui unissent les membres d’un groupe familial. À partir de données quantitative inédites sur l’évolution des solidarités familiales à Montréal, le présent article explore les différents « espaces » préalables à la mise en oeuvre concrète de solidarités : espace de la parenté, espace des affinités, espace des sociabilités et espace géographique. Le résultat le plus intéressant de cette démarche exploratoire est la confirmation, en langage quantitatif, d’importants constats qualitatifs établis par Fortin et Dandurand-Ouellette pour les villes de Québec et de Montréal il y a une vingtaine d’années.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it