Robust Model Predictive Control Design for Fault-Tolerant Control of Process Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work considers the problem of stabilization of nonlinear systems subject to constraints, uncertainty and faults in the control actuator. We first design a robust model predictive controller that allows for an explicit characterization of the set of initial conditions starting from where feasibility of the optimization problem and closed-loop stability is guaranteed. The main idea in designing the robust model predictive controller is to employ Lyapunov-based techniques to formulate constraints that (a) explicitly account for uncertainty in the predictive control law, without making the optimization problem computationally intractable, and (b) allow for explicitly characterizing the set of initial conditions starting from where the constraints are guaranteed to be initially and successively feasible. The explicit characterization of the stability region, together with the constraint handling capabilities and optimality properties of the predictive controller, is utilized to achieve fault-tolerant control of nonlinear systems subject to uncertainty, constraints, and faults in the control actuators. The implementation of the proposed method is illustrated via a chemical reactor example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it