MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983740721 · doi:10.1021/ja040167i

Probing the Local Environments of Phosphorus in Aluminophosphate-Based Mesostructured Lamellar Materials by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy

2005· article· en· W1983740721 on OpenAlexaff
Yining Huang, Zhimin Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHeteronuclear moleculeSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceLamellar structureResonance (particle physics)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyMagic angle spinningCoordination sphereSpectroscopyPopulationCrystallographyMagnetic dipole–dipole interactionDipoleCrystal structureNuclear magnetic resonanceStereochemistryAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have characterized a series of mesostructured aluminophosphate (AlPO)-based lamellar materials by several solid-state NMR techniques. In particular, we were able to estimate the average number of Al atoms and identify the nature of other ancillary groups in the second coordination sphere for each P site. Our work has shown that a combination of several dipolar coupling-based (31)P/(27)Al double-resonance techniques such as transfer of population in double-resonance (TRAPDOR), rotational echo double-resonance (REDOR), and heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy (HETCOR) as well as (1)H --> (31)P cross polarization (CP) can provide more detailed structural information regarding the local environments of P and Al atoms in AlPO-based mesostructured materials, which is not readily available from straightforward (31)P and (27)Al magic-angle spinning (MAS) experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207