MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983767104 · doi:10.1108/02630801211228725

Implications of rising groundwater level on structural integrity of underground structures – investigations and retrofit of a large building complex

2012· article· en· W1983767104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Survey · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfillBasementCivil engineeringFinite element methodSlabStructural systemEngineeringConstruction engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Groundwater levels (GWL) are rising in many cities in the world. The purpose of this study is to present the multi‐faceted approach adopted for examining the impact of a 3 m rise in GWL on the durability, stability and strength of the structural components of a building complex with 40,000 m 2 basement. It also reports on the retrofit measures adopted to remedy the situation. Design/methodology/approach The overall stability of the building complex was examined for the revised loading conditions as well as the need to strengthen the structurally deficient components to satisfy owner's requirement of a dry and operational basement without the dewatering operation. Structural conditions of the basement walls and a slab of the building complex were assessed based on code guidelines, visual observations, site investigations, analytical finite element model (FEM) studies and sound engineering judgement. Findings About 25 percent of the existing basement slab was found to be structrally deficient to resist the applied hydrostatic load. A number of articulation and construction details were also found to be inadequate. Various options for retrofit for the deficient structural components and articulation details were examined and design details were presented for a cost‐effective solution. Research limitations/implications The presented methodology is general and can be adopted for similar situations. However, the presented solutions and conclusions are specific to the problem presented herein and modifications will be required for adoption to other situations. Practical implications Practising engineers are made aware of the problem of rising GWL for underground structures. Practical information is presented for practising engineers to solve the problem of water leakage in a large basement. Originality/value This paper presents an integrated approach for addressing the structural implications of rising groundwater level in an operational basement of a large building complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it