MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genome Wide Association Mapping of <i>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</i> Resistance in Soybean with a Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing Approach

2014· article· en· W1983779735 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maxime Bastien, Humira Sonah, François Belzile

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Genome · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotiniaLinkage disequilibriumGeneticsGenotypingAssociation mappingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPopulationGenetic associationAlleleMarker-assisted selectionPlant disease resistanceGenetic markerGenotypeGeneHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sclerotinia stem rot (SSR) is one of the most important pests in cool soybean growing regions of the Northeastern United States and Canada. However, the intensity of infestations varies considerably from year to year according to weather conditions, thus making it difficult for breeders to select under uniform disease pressure. Selection for resistance to SSR would be greatly facilitated by the use of molecular markers. In this work, a collection of 130 lines was inoculated using the cotton pad method and was genetically characterized using a genotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS) protocol optimized for soybean. Genome‐wide association mapping (AM) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analyses were performed with 7864 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Linkage disequilibrium varied considerably over physical distance, reaching a r 2 value of 0.2 after 8.5 Mb in the pericentromeric region and 0.5 Mb in the telomeric region. The mixed linear model (MLM) performed very well in accounting for population structure and relatedness, as only 5.5% of the observed p ‐values were < 0.05. The strongest association was found on chromosome Gm15 ( p ‐value = 1.38 × 10 –6 ; q ‐value [adjusted p ‐value] = 0.011). Two additional SNP markers in the vicinity had a q ‐value < 0.1. This marker was validated in the progeny of a biparental cross, where F 4:6 lines carrying the susceptibility allele developed lesions 17.6 mm longer than lines carrying the resistance allele. Interestingly, other genes contributing to resistance to pathogens have been reported in this region of Gm15. Three other association peaks having a q ‐value < 0.1 were detected on chromosomes Gm01, Gm19, and Gm20.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant GenomeSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207