MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983812077 · doi:10.1017/s0022112004008560

Nonlinear stability of a visco-plastically lubricated viscous shear flow

2004· article· en· W1983812077 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Moyers-González, I.A. Frigaard, C. Nouar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsBingham plasticNewtonian fluidHerschel–Bulkley fluidShear flowReynolds numberMaterials scienceViscous liquidShear (geology)Hele-Shaw flowNonlinear systemFlow (mathematics)Open-channel flowPhysicsRheologyTurbulenceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common problem in multi-layer shear flows, especially from the perspective of process engineering, is the occurrence of interfacial instabilities. Here we show how multi-layer duct flows can in fact be made nonlinearly stable, by using a suitable lubricating fluid. First we show how interfacial instabilities may be eliminated through the introduction of a yield stress fluid as the lubricant and by preserving an unyielded layer adjacent to the interface. Second we show how to treat the nonlinear stability of a two-layer flow, allowing finite motion of the domains. We focus on the simplest practically interesting case of visco-plastically lubricated viscous shear flow: a core–annular pipe flow consisting of a central core of Newtonian fluid surrounded by a Bingham fluid. We demonstrate that this flow can be nonlinearly stable at significant Reynolds numbers and produce stability bounds. Our analysis can be straightforwardly generalized to other flows in this class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207