MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983814965 · doi:10.7202/1007879ar

Les entrepreneurs artisans et opportunistes : Une comparaison de leurs comportements de gestion

2012· article· fr· W1983814965 on OpenAlex
Jean Lorrain, Louis Dussault

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude sur les comportements de gestion privilégiés par les différents types d'entrepreneurs dont les entreprises manufacturières sont en phase de survie et d’établissement. Soixante-dix entrepreneurs ont répondu à des questionnaires sur les lieux de travail et les résultats révèlent que ces deux types d’entrepreneurs (entrepreneur artisan vs entrepreneur opportuniste) se différencient quant à leurs comportements de gestion à ce stade de développement de l’entreprise. La gestion de l’entrepreneur opportuniste apparaît plus équilibrée que celle de l’entrepreneur artisan à ce stade de l’entreprise. Bref, la principale conclusion qui découle de cette recherche est l’importance de tenir compte des types d'entrepreneurs dans les études sur la gestion des PME à différents stades de leur existence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it