MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983820744 · doi:10.1139/o04-037

Maintenance of Epstein–Barr virus-derived episomal vectors in the murine Sp2/0 myeloma cell line is dependent upon exogenous expression of human EBP2

2004· article· en· W1983820744 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie‐Eve Habel, Mathieu Drouin, Daniel Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsHéma-Québec
FundersOffice of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of Health
KeywordsExtrachromosomal DNABiologyVector (molecular biology)VirologyCell culturePlasmidEpstein–Barr virusVirusExpression vectorMolecular biologyDNACell biologyGeneGeneticsRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vectors carrying the origin of replication (oriP) and driving expression of the EBNA-1 protein from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) replicate as extrachromosomal episomes in human cells. Whether these vectors can be maintained as episomes in murine cells is still controversial. Here we demonstrate that EBNA-1 expression alone was unable to maintain episomal expression of an EBV-based vector in the murine Sp2/0 cell line. However, we were able to obtain long-term episome maintenance in Sp2/0 cells after exogenously expressing human EBP2 by genetic engineering. Our results provide further evidence for the fundamental role of human EBP2 in episomal maintenance of EBV-based vectors. Moreover, we demonstrate that EBV-based vectors can be successfully used in cells presumably incompetent for episomal maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207