MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983838844 · doi:10.1145/1822327.1822330

Toward an estimation of distribution algorithm for the evolution of artificial neural networks

2010· article· en· W1983838844 on OpenAlexaff
Graham Holker, Marcus Vinicius dos Santos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene expression programmingProbabilistic logicNeuroevolutionEstimation of distribution algorithmComputer scienceChromosomeArtificial neural networkEvolutionary algorithmDomain (mathematical analysis)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmEvolutionary computationProbabilistic neural networkMachine learningMathematicsTime delay neural networkGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the preliminary results of a unique method of neuroevolution called Probabilistic Developmental Neuroevolution (PDNE). PDNE builds upon Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Probabilistic Incremental Program Evolution (PIPE). Instead of building a Probabilistic Prototype Tree, as in PIPE, a Probabilistic Prototype Chromosome is built. The chromosome has a similar structure to a GEP chromosome (head, tail, and weight domain) and contains probabilities for each element of the gene. With this methodology, neural networks can be expressed in a similar manner to GEP, and solutions can be evolved via an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm. Preliminary results show promise, but further work is required to match the results of GEP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207