Active disturbance rejection control for power plant with a single loop
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The cascade proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) control method is widely used in power plant control field. In this paper, an active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) for a power plant with a single loop is introduced for eliminating the shortcomings of the cascade PID control method. The proposed controller based on the ADRC method consists of a tracking differentiator (TD), an extended state observer (ESO) and a nonlinear combination of errors. In this approach, the processes with higher orders, uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics are viewed as lower‐ordered systems with general disturbances, and the general disturbances are estimated by ESO, and then actively compensated. Besides, only one measured output is needed in the proposed method instead of two or three in the cascade PID control method. Some simulation studies compared with the regular cascade PID control method show the proposed method has better performance beyond the regular cascade PID control method. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley and Sons Asia Pte Ltd and Chinese Automatic Control Society
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it