MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983882285 · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n7p67

Cloning, Expression and Characterization of PnLOX2 Gene Related to Aspergillus flavus-resistance from Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Seed Coat

2012· article· en· W1983882285 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caixia Yan, Chunjuan Li, Shu-Bo Wan, Tingting Zhang, Yixiong Zheng, Shihua Shan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPeanut Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAspergillus flavusArachis hypogaeaBiologyGeneGenotypeInoculationAspergillusCloning (programming)Gene expressionBotanyGeneticsHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspergillus flavus is one of the major diseases of peanut. The objective of the study was to clone PnLOX2 gene from peanut seed coat and analyze its expression. Real-time RT-PCR analysis indicated that the gene was overexpressed in the challenge of Aspergillus flavus and the greatest expression occurred 10 days after inoculation. The full length of PnLOX2 gene was 2592bp and encoded a 97.5kDa protein containing 863 amino acids. The fusion protein (apparent 121.5kDa) only existed in the precipitation and the maximum was obtained by inducing at 37ºC for 3.5h. As a result of response to the challenge of Aspergillus flavus, PnLOX2 gene was more greatly expressed in the resistant genotype than in the susceptible genotype. It indicated that PnLOX2 gene was closely related to Aspergillus flavus-resistance of peanut. Further investigations were needed to bacteriostatically identify the gene in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPeanut Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207