MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983893112 · doi:10.1097/rct.0b013e3181c34626

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstration of a Single Lesion Causing Wallerian Degeneration in Ascending and Descending Tracts in the Spinal Cord

2010· article· en· W1983893112 on OpenAlexaff
Hany Kashani, Richard Farb, Walter Kucharczyk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWallerian degenerationMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingDegeneration (medical)LesionSpinal cordAnatomyCordPathologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A magnetic resonance image of a 50-year-old man with a remote history of cervical spine injury showed focal myelomalacia at C5 and hyperintense areas on T2-weighted images laterally and posteriorly in the cord above and below C5. We believe these lesions to be due to Wallerian degeneration, with the cephalocaudal level of the Wallerian degeneration lesions dependant on the direction of the tracts relative to the C5 lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computer Assisted TomographySame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207