Instruments for the Assessment of Childhood Trauma in Adults
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between childhood trauma and adult psychopathology has been explored in the literature. The goal of this study is to compare existing instruments that measure retrospective interpersonal gross childhood trauma. A computerized search from 1985 to March 2003 was performed to locate instruments used to measure childhood trauma. These were divided into interview-rated and self-report measures and were compared on various parameters. Twenty-one observer-rated and 21 self-report instruments were identified. In a comparison, five observer-rated measures and three self-report measures stand out for having favorable characteristics such as assessing multiple types of trauma and reporting on psychometric properties. A number of instruments are designed to measure a single type of trauma, usually sexual abuse, but most of these do not report psychometric properties. A few instruments used to measure retrospective childhood trauma are particularly useful for systematic research in adult psychiatric disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it