MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functional expression of corticotropin‐releasing hormone (CRH) receptor 1 in cultured rat microglia

2002· article· en· W1983908652 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Wang, Ping Ji, Richard J. Riopelle, Kimberly Dow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityKingston General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceptorCorticotropin-releasing hormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMicrogliaRadioligandHormoneInflammationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), known as a key regulator of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to stress, elicits its biological effects by binding to two membrane receptors (CRH-R1 and CRH-R2). The present studies examined the presence of functional expression of CRH receptors in cultured microglia of rat. CRH-R1 mRNA and protein were detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blotting and receptor chemical cross-linking assay in cultured microglia. CRH-R2 mRNA was undetectable by RT-PCR. The radioligand binding analysis using [125I]Tyr-rat/human CRH revealed a high affinity binding site (Kd of 1.2 nm and Bmax of 84 fmol/mg of protein). Competition studies using CRH and related peptides indicated kinetic and pharmacological characteristics consistent with the CRH-R1 receptor subtype. Receptor chemical cross-linking assay demonstrated a single band of CRH receptor with a molecular weight of -77 kDa, which was inhibited in the presence of excess unlabeled rat/human CRH in a dose-dependent manner and inhibited by a CRH receptor antagonist astressin. Functional coupled cAMP production in cultured microglia was stimulated by exogenous addition of CRH and related peptides in a dose-dependent manner and blocked by astressin. Our findings suggest the functional expression of CRH-R1 receptor in rat microglia, indicating an important mechanism of interaction between immune and neuroendocrine systems in brain physiological and pathological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207