Long-Range Antiferromagnetic Ordering in the Novel Magnetically Frustrated Rock Salt Oxide System: Li<sub>3</sub>Mg<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>6</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The new ruthenate, Li 3 Mg 2 RuO 6, was synthesized in polycrystalline form by a solid-state method. The crystal structure of Li 3 Mg 2 RuO 6 was refined from powder neutron diffraction data in the orthorhombic Fddd space group in an ordered NaCl structure type with a = 5.8759 (2) Å, b = 8.4206 (1) Å, and c = 17.6455 (5) Å. The Ru 5+ ( S = 3/2) sublattice shows a unique topology, which consists of chains of edge-sharing triangles interconnected by corner sharing and thus there exists the potential for geometric magnetic frustration. This is the first time that magnetic behavior of a material with such sublattice has been investigated. The isostructural, nonmagnetic Li 3 Mg 2 NbO 6 was prepared as the lattice match for the heat capacity analysis. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, heat capacity, and neutron diffraction data reveal that the system undergoes a long-range AFM ordering below 17 K but also provide evidence for short-range spin correlations well above T N . The magnetic frustration index, f ≈ 109/17 = 6.4 suggests that the system is geometrically frustrated. Spin dimer analysis of the magnetic exchange interactions supports this characterization. Comparisons are made with other materials containing the Ru 5+ ion on geometrically frustrated lattices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".